Section
9.10 of the Merger Agreement in Union Rentals v. Ram
Holdings, Inc. entitled "Specific Performance"
provided:
The parties
agree that irreparable damage would occur in
the
event that any of the provisions of this Agreement
were not
performed in accordance with their specific
terms or were
otherwise breached. Accordingly, (a)[RAM Holdings]
and [RAM Acquisition] shall be entitled to
seek an injunction or injunctions to prevent
breaches of
this Agreement by the Company and to enforce
specifically the terms and provisions of this
Agreement, in
addition to any other remedy to which such party is
entitled at law or in equity and (b) the
Company
shall be entitled to seek an injunction or injunctions to
prevent breaches of this Agreement by [RAM Holdings]
or [RAM Acquisition] or to enforce specifically
the terms and provisions of this Agreement
and
the Guarantee to prevent breaches of or enforce
compliance with
those covenants of [RAM Holdings] or [RAM
Acquisition] that require [RAM Holdings] or
[RAM
Acquisition] to (i) use its reasonable best efforts
to obtain the
Financing and satisfy the conditions to closing
set
forth in Section 7.1 and Section 7.3, including the
covenants set
forth in Section 6.8 and Section 6.10 and (ii) consummate
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, if
in the case of this clause (ii), the Financing
(or
Alternative Financing obtained in accordance with
Section
6.10(b)) is available to be drawn down by [RAM
Holdings]
pursuant to the terms of the applicable agreements but
is not so drawn down solely as a result of
[RAM Holdings]
or [RAM Acquisition] refusing to do so in breach of
this Agreement. The provisions of this Section 9.10
shall be subject in all respects to Section
8.2(e) hereof,
which Section shall govern the rights and
obligations of
the parties hereto (and of [Cerberus Partners], the
Parent Related Parties, and the Company Related
Parties) under the circumstances provided
therein.
The
relevant portion of Section 8.2 (e) of the Merger Agreement
as quoted by Chancellor Chandler in his opinion provided:
Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary in this Agreement,
including with respect to Sections 7.4 and
9.10, (i) the
Company’s right to terminate this Agreement
in
compliance with the provisions of Sections 8.1(d)(i)
and
(ii) and its right to receive the Parent Termination
Fee
pursuant to Section 8.2(c) or the guarantee thereof
pursuant to the Guarantee, and (ii) [RAM Holdings]
’s right to
terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section
8.1
(e)(i) and (ii) and its right to receive the Company
Termination Fee
pursuant to Section 8.2(b) shall, in each
case, be the
sole and exclusive remedy, including on account of
punitive damages, of (in the case of clause (i))
the
Company and its subsidiaries against [RAM
Holdings], [RAM
Acquisition], [Cerberus Partners] or any of their
respective affiliates, stockholders, general
partners,
limited partners, members, managers, directors,
officers,
employees or agents (collectively “Parent
Related
Parties”) and (in the
case of clause (ii)) [RAM Holdings] and [RAM Acquisition]
against the Company or its
subsidiaries, affiliates, stockholders, directors,
officers,
employees or agents (collectively “Company
Related
Parties”), for any and all
loss or damage suffered as a result
thereof, and upon any termination specified in clause (i)
or (ii) of this Section 8.2(e) and payment of the
Parent
Termination Fee or Company Termination Fee, as
the
case may be, none of [RAM Holdings], [RAM
Acquisition],
[Cerberus Partners] or any of their respective
Parent Related Parties or the Company or any
of
the Company Related Parties shall have any further
liability or
obligation of any kind or nature relating to or
arising out of
this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement as a result of such termination.
…
In no event,
whether or not this Agreement has been terminated
pursuant to any provision hereof, shall [RAM
Holdings], [RAM
Acquisition], [Cerberus Partners] or the Parent
Related Parties, either individually or in the
aggregate, be
subject to any liability in excess of the
Parent
Termination Fee for any or all losses or damages
relating to or
arising out of this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, including
breaches by
[RAM Holdings] or [RAM Acquisition] of any
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements
contained in
this Agreement, and in no event shall the
Company seek
equitable relief or seek to recover any money damages
in excess of such amount from [RAM Holdings], [RAM
Acquisition], [Cerberus Partners] or any Parent
Related Party or any of their respective
Representatives.
It
is interesting to note that the sentence commencing with
the word "accordingly" in the fourth line of Section 9.10
above contained 220 words. Yes, 220 words in one sentence.
At
page 139 of the book "Real World Document Drafting
® -A
Dispute-Avoidance Approach" under the heading
"Break it
Up: Fragmenting for Clarity"
I deal with how to deal with such long sentences.
Elsewhere
in the book I suggest that a lawyer receiving a draft
document that includes such a block of solid text might
consider reformatting and tabulating the provision. This
often makes the provision at least a bit more
understandable.
By following my own advise but without making several other
clarifying revisions I came up with the following :
9.10.1 The
parties agree that irreparable damage would occur in
the
event that any of the provisions of this Agreement
were not
performed in accordance with their specific
terms or were
otherwise breached. Accordingly,
(a)
[RAM Holdings]
and [RAM Acquisition] shall be entitled to
seek an injunction or injunctions to prevent
breaches of
this Agreement by the Company and to enforce
specifically the terms and provisions of this
Agreement, in
addition to any other remedy to which such party is
entitled at law or in equity and
(b) the Company shall
be entitled to seek an injunction or injunctions to prevent
breaches of this Agreement by [RAM Holdings]
or [RAM Acquisition] or to enforce specifically
the terms and provisions of this Agreement
and
the Guarantee to prevent breaches of or enforce
compliance with
those covenants of [RAM Holdings] or [RAM
Acquisition] that require [RAM Holdings] or
[RAM
Acquisition] to
(i) use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the
Financing and satisfy the conditions to closing
set
forth in Section 7.1 and Section 7.3, including the
covenants set
forth in Section 6.8 and Section 6.10 and
(ii) consummate the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement, if
in the case of this clause (ii), the Financing
(or
Alternative Financing obtained in accordance with
Section
6.10(b)) is available to be drawn down by [RAM
Holdings]
pursuant to the terms of the applicable agreements but
is not so drawn down solely as a result of
[RAM Holdings]
or [RAM Acquisition] refusing to do so in breach of
this Agreement.
9.10.2 The provisions of this Section 9.10
shall be subject in all respects to Section
8.2(e) hereof,
which Section shall govern the rights and
obligations of
the parties hereto (and of [Cerberus Partners], the
Parent Related Parties, and the Company Related
Parties) under the circumstances provided
therein.
One
may wonder why such formatting wasn't used in the actual
document.
The first sentence of Section 8.2(e) as quoted by
Chancellor Chandler contained 272 words. Wow !!!Although a
full redraft would have helped immeasurably as an aid to
better understanding just what was drafted Section 8.2(e)
of the Merger Agreement might have been reformatted by the
lawyer receiving the same as follows:
Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary in this Agreement,
including with respect to Sections 7.4 and
9.10,
(i) the Company’s right to terminate this Agreement
in
compliance with the provisions of Sections 8.1(d)(i)
and
(ii) and its right to receive the Parent Termination
Fee
pursuant to Section 8.2(c) or the guarantee thereof
pursuant to the Guarantee, and
(ii) [RAM Holdings] ’s right to
terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section
8.1
(e)(i) and (ii) and its right to receive the Company
Termination Fee
pursuant to Section 8.2(b)
shall, in each case, be the
sole and exclusive remedy, including on account of
punitive damages, of
(in the case of clause (i)) the Company and
its subsidiaries against [RAM Holdings], [RAM
Acquisition], [Cerberus Partners] or any of their
respective affiliates, stockholders, general
partners,
limited partners, members, managers, directors,
officers,
employees or agents (collectively “Parent
Related
Parties”) and
(in the case of clause (ii)) [RAM Holdings] and [RAM
Acquisition] against the Company or its
subsidiaries, affiliates, stockholders, directors,
officers,
employees or agents (collectively “Company
Related
Parties”), for any and all
loss or damage suffered as a result
thereof.
Upon any termination specified in clause (i) or (ii) of
this Section 8.2(e) and payment of the Parent
Termination Fee or Company Termination Fee, as
the
case may be, none of [RAM Holdings], [RAM
Acquisition],
[Cerberus Partners] or any of their respective
Parent Related Parties or the Company or any
of
the Company Related Parties shall have any further
liability or
obligation of any kind or nature relating to or
arising out of
this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement as a result of such termination.
…
In no event,
whether or not this Agreement has been terminated
pursuant to any provision hereof, shall [RAM
Holdings], [RAM
Acquisition], [Cerberus Partners] or the Parent
Related Parties, either individually or in the
aggregate, be
subject to any liability in excess of the
Parent
Termination Fee for any or all losses or damages
relating to or
arising out of this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, including
breaches by
[RAM Holdings] or [RAM Acquisition] of any
representations, warranties, covenants or agreements
contained in
this Agreement.
In no event shall the Company seek
equitable relief or seek to recover any money damages
in excess of such amount from [RAM Holdings], [RAM
Acquisition], [Cerberus Partners] or any Parent
Related Party or any of their respective
Representatives.